Taking sides. (Record no. 25680)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 05992cas a2200277 a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field vtls003053167
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field MY-SjTCS
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20200226103632.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 070605c20059999iaugr1 0 a0eng c
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9780072953282 (pbk.)
022 0# - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1548-7555
039 #9 - LEVEL OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL AND CODING DETAIL [OBSOLETE]
Level of rules in bibliographic description 201602291719
Level of effort used to assign nonsubject heading access points malathy
Level of effort used to assign subject headings 200706051606
Level of effort used to assign classification chon ling
-- 200706051605
-- chon ling
082 04 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 153
Item number TAK
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Taking sides.
Name of part/section of a work Clashing views on controversial issues in cognitive science/
Statement of responsibility, etc. Selected, edited, and with introductions by Marion Mason.
246 30 - VARYING FORM OF TITLE
Title proper/short title Clashing views on controversial issues in cognitive science
246 30 - VARYING FORM OF TITLE
Title proper/short title Issues in cognitive science
246 30 - VARYING FORM OF TITLE
Title proper/short title Cognitive science
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 1st ed.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Dubuque, Iowa :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. McGraw-Hill/Dushkin,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. c2005-
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent xxvi, 435 p. ;
Dimensions 24 cm.
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc. note Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note Part One. Mind and Brain. Issue 1. Are mind and brain the same? Yes: A Review Essay: Recent Literature on Cognitive Science (1999) / Paul C.L. Tang. No: Five Dangers of Materialism (2002) / Jon Mills -- Issue 2. Do children develop theories about other people's minds? Yes: Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth About False Belief (2001) / Henry M. Wellman, David Cross and Julanne Watson. No: Minds, Modules, and Meta-Analysis (2001) / Brian J. Scholl and Alan M. Leslie -- Issue 3. Is mindfulness a cognitive style? Yes: Images of Mindfulness (2000) / Robert J. Sternberg. No: The Construct of Mindfulness (2000) / Ellen J. Langer and Mihnea Moldoveanu. Part Two. Concepts. Issue 4. Are we overestimating infants' math ability? Yes: How Infants Process Addition and Subtraction Events (2002) / Leslie B. Cohen and Kathryn S. Marks. No: Do Infants Have Numerical Expectations or Just Perceptual Preferences? (2002) / Karen Wynn -- Issue 5. Can infants develop abstract concepts? Yes: Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy (2000) / Jean M. Mandler. No: Commentary on Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy (2000) / Eleanor J. Gibson -- Issue 6. Is sensory information the strongest part of a stored concept? Yes: Why Is a Verb Like an Inanimate Object? (2000) / Helen Bird, David Howard and Sue Franklin. No: Sometimes a Noun Is Just a Noun: Comments on Bird, Howard, and Franklin (2001) / Kevin Shapiro and Alfonso Caramazza. Part Three. Memory. Issue 7. Is novice memory based on associations? Yes: Novice Construction of Chess Memory (2001) / Pertti Saariluoma and Tei Laine. No: Chunk Hierarchies and Retrieval Structures: Comments on Saariluoma and Laine (2001) / Fernand Gobet -- Issue 8. Is imagination inflation imaginary? Yes: Imagination Inflation: A Statistical Artifact of Regression Toward the Mean (2001) / Kathy Pezdek and Rebecca M. Eddy. No: Imagination Inflation Is a Fact, Not an Artifact: A Reply to Pezdek and Eddy (2001) / Maryanne Garry, et al. -- Issue 9. Is adult memory for childhood abuse unreliable? Yes: Adult Recollections of Childhood Abuse: Cognitive and Developmental Perspectives (1998) / Peter A. Ornstein, Stephen J. Ceci and Elizabeth F. Loftus. No: Comment on Ornstein, Ceci, and Loftus: Adult Recollections of Childhood Abuse (1998) / Judith L. Alpert, Laura S. Brown and Christine A. Courtois. Part Four. Language. Issue 10. Is context stronger than frequency? Yes: Strength of Discourse Context as a Determinant of the Subordinate Bias Effect (1999) / Charles Martin, et al. No: Contextual Strength and the Subordinate Bias Effect: Comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf (1999) / Keith Rayner, Katherine S. Binder and Susan A. Duffy -- Issue 11. Is stuttering isolated from lexical retrieval? Yes: Stuttering and Lexical Retrieval (2001) / Ann Packman, et al. No: Non-Word Reading, Lexical Retrieval and Stuttering: Comments on Packman, Onslow, Coombes and Goodwin (2002) / James Au-Yeung and Peter Howell -- Issue 12. Can computer methods explain language disorders? Yes: Control and Cross-Domain Mental Computation: Evidence from Language Breakdown / William Frawley. No: Reach Exceeds Grasp: Comments on Frawley's 'Control and Cross-Domain Mental Computation: Evidence from Language Breakdown' (2002) / B. Chandrasekaran. Part Five. Intelligence. Issue 13. Is emotional intelligence really a form of intelligence? Yes: Models of Emotional Intelligence (2000) / John D. Mayer, Peter Salovey and David Caruso. No: Does Emotional Intelligence Meet Traditional Standards for an Intelligence? Some New Data and Conclusions (2001) / Richard D. Roberts, Moshe Zeidner and Gerald Matthews -- Issue 14. Is the birth order effect on intelligence real? Yes: Resolving the Debate Over Birth Order, Family Size, and Intelligence (2000) / Joseph Lee Rodgers, et al. No: The Family Dynamics of Intellectual Development (2001) / R.B. Zajonc. Part Six. Reasoning and Intuition. Issue 15. Can a neural network model account for moral development? Yes: Toward a Cognitive Neurobiology of the Moral Virtues (2001) / Paul M. Churchland. No: Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgment or How the Defining Issues Test is Supported by Cognitive Science (2002) / Darcia Narvaez and Tonia Bock -- Issue 16. Do we use reasoning to make moral decisions? Yes: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to Morality Research (2000) / James R. Rest, et al. No: The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment (2002) / Jonathan Haidt -- Issue 17. Is intuition a valid way of knowing? Yes: Intuition: An Important Tool in the Practice of Nursing (2001) / Helen H.I. McCutcheon and Jan Pincombe. No: A Model for Change for Evidence-Based Practice (1999) / Mary Ann Rosswurm and June H. Larrabee -- Issue 18. Should schools teach for wisdom? Yes: Why Schools Should Teach for Wisdom: The Balance Theory of Wisdom in Educational Settings (2001) / Robert J. Sternberg. No: Wisdom, Snake Oil, and the Educational Marketplace (2001) / Scott G. Paris.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Cognitive science
9 (RLIN) 15061
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mason, Marion.
9 (RLIN) 24822
920 ## - Programme
Programme SLAS : 99211
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha biblionumber 25680
Koha biblioitemnumber 25680
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Cost, normal purchase price Total Checkouts Barcode Date last seen Date last checked out Copy number Cost, replacement price Koha item type Public note
          Taylor's Library-TU Taylor's Library-TU 2007-06-05 93.50 3 1000515492 2019-12-05 2008-12-05 1 93.50 Main Collection SLASx,05000,03,GR